<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Falwell, part one</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hugoschwyzer.net/2007/05/15/falwell-part-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hugoschwyzer.net/2007/05/15/falwell-part-one/</link>
	<description>Author, Speaker, Professor, Shattering Gender Myths</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:44:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SamChevre</title>
		<link>http://www.hugoschwyzer.net/2007/05/15/falwell-part-one/#comment-23007</link>
		<dc:creator>SamChevre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 19:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/05/15/falwell-part-one/#comment-23007</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Surely, even for those who consider homosexuality offensive to God, it should be more on the order of the level of offense of something like gossip or masturbation than something like slavery?&lt;/i&gt;

Lynn,

If you asked &lt;b&gt;me&lt;/b&gt; what offenses should be serious vs less serious, &lt;b&gt;I &lt;/b&gt; would agree with you.  But I can easily see why another Christian might disagree.  Sexual offenses seem to be generally considered extremely serious in both the Torah, and in the New Testament.  And slavery seems to be in the &quot;not a great idea, but OK&quot; category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Surely, even for those who consider homosexuality offensive to God, it should be more on the order of the level of offense of something like gossip or masturbation than something like slavery?</i></p>
<p>Lynn,</p>
<p>If you asked <b>me</b> what offenses should be serious vs less serious, <b>I </b> would agree with you.  But I can easily see why another Christian might disagree.  Sexual offenses seem to be generally considered extremely serious in both the Torah, and in the New Testament.  And slavery seems to be in the &#8220;not a great idea, but OK&#8221; category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ks</title>
		<link>http://www.hugoschwyzer.net/2007/05/15/falwell-part-one/#comment-23006</link>
		<dc:creator>ks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 14:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/05/15/falwell-part-one/#comment-23006</guid>
		<description>Xrlq,

I know I&#039;m late to this party, but sincerely believing something does not make one less of a horrible person.  Sure, Falwell sincerely believed all the stuff he preached (and his rhetoric &lt;i&gt;did&lt;/i&gt; incite violence against gays and women, even if he didn&#039;t actually commit that violence himself), but that doesn&#039;t make the stuff he believed or his words any less repugnant.  And it doesn&#039;t make him any less of a great big giant asshole in the eyes of those of us he directed his hate and bigotry toward.  And not to continue the Hitler/Bin Laden comparison, because Falwell definitely did not reach that level of awful, but those guys also sincerely believed in the stuff they said/did, and are still generally considered to be two of the worst people to ever live.

That isn&#039;t saying that I, personally, would revel in his death or wish him in hell, because I don&#039;t believe in hell in the first place and I can&#039;t think of anyone that I would actively wish death on.  But I can certainly understand why others would, at minimum, be relieved that he is no longer in this world to continue spreading his message of hate.  And I also understand comments like Amanda&#039;s and other athiests as merely pointing out the hypocrisy of someone with Falwell&#039;s stated beliefs acting as he did in this life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xrlq,</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m late to this party, but sincerely believing something does not make one less of a horrible person.  Sure, Falwell sincerely believed all the stuff he preached (and his rhetoric <i>did</i> incite violence against gays and women, even if he didn&#8217;t actually commit that violence himself), but that doesn&#8217;t make the stuff he believed or his words any less repugnant.  And it doesn&#8217;t make him any less of a great big giant asshole in the eyes of those of us he directed his hate and bigotry toward.  And not to continue the Hitler/Bin Laden comparison, because Falwell definitely did not reach that level of awful, but those guys also sincerely believed in the stuff they said/did, and are still generally considered to be two of the worst people to ever live.</p>
<p>That isn&#8217;t saying that I, personally, would revel in his death or wish him in hell, because I don&#8217;t believe in hell in the first place and I can&#8217;t think of anyone that I would actively wish death on.  But I can certainly understand why others would, at minimum, be relieved that he is no longer in this world to continue spreading his message of hate.  And I also understand comments like Amanda&#8217;s and other athiests as merely pointing out the hypocrisy of someone with Falwell&#8217;s stated beliefs acting as he did in this life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://www.hugoschwyzer.net/2007/05/15/falwell-part-one/#comment-23005</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 02:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/05/15/falwell-part-one/#comment-23005</guid>
		<description>On what basis?  Because he believed the Biblical passages that label homosexuality a sin?  By that reasoning, all evangelical Christians, all Orthodox Jews and all Muslims of every stripe are &quot;enemies&quot; of each other, and of just about everyone else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On what basis?  Because he believed the Biblical passages that label homosexuality a sin?  By that reasoning, all evangelical Christians, all Orthodox Jews and all Muslims of every stripe are &#8220;enemies&#8221; of each other, and of just about everyone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler D</title>
		<link>http://www.hugoschwyzer.net/2007/05/15/falwell-part-one/#comment-23004</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 00:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/05/15/falwell-part-one/#comment-23004</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Speaking of enemies - the real kind, that is - get a load of what the real enemies of gays think about Jerry Falwell.&lt;/i&gt;

Fred Phelps went off the deep end long ago - now he&#039;s just an aging media whore desperate for another few minutes of attention. His &quot;God Hates Everybody&quot; schtick has worn thin. And if we&#039;ve got Hitler and bin Laden in the mix, it&#039;s worth pointing out that neither Phelps nor Falwell have actually killed anybody nor ordered their death. Their weapons are words and rhetoric - the actual killin&#039; is left to the folks who take their message very literally and try to put it into action (e.g. Eric Rudolph)

Falwell, while not as directly hateful, is nevertheless highly deserving of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/stupidquotes/a/falwellquotes.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;batshitinsane&lt;/a&gt; label along with Phelps.

I don&#039;t think it&#039;s too much of a stretch to deem Falwell an enemy of gays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Speaking of enemies &#8211; the real kind, that is &#8211; get a load of what the real enemies of gays think about Jerry Falwell.</i></p>
<p>Fred Phelps went off the deep end long ago &#8211; now he&#8217;s just an aging media whore desperate for another few minutes of attention. His &#8220;God Hates Everybody&#8221; schtick has worn thin. And if we&#8217;ve got Hitler and bin Laden in the mix, it&#8217;s worth pointing out that neither Phelps nor Falwell have actually killed anybody nor ordered their death. Their weapons are words and rhetoric &#8211; the actual killin&#8217; is left to the folks who take their message very literally and try to put it into action (e.g. Eric Rudolph)</p>
<p>Falwell, while not as directly hateful, is nevertheless highly deserving of the <a href="http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/stupidquotes/a/falwellquotes.htm" rel="nofollow">batshitinsane</a> label along with Phelps.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s too much of a stretch to deem Falwell an enemy of gays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuzu</title>
		<link>http://www.hugoschwyzer.net/2007/05/15/falwell-part-one/#comment-23003</link>
		<dc:creator>zuzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 22:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/05/15/falwell-part-one/#comment-23003</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I did suggest, however, that you have to be an enemy on the scale of Hitler to warrant comparison to â€¦ oh, I donâ€™t know â€¦ Hitler???!!! &lt;/i&gt;

Too bad the person you were responding to didn&#039;t make that comparison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I did suggest, however, that you have to be an enemy on the scale of Hitler to warrant comparison to â€¦ oh, I donâ€™t know â€¦ Hitler???!!! </i></p>
<p>Too bad the person you were responding to didn&#8217;t make that comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://www.hugoschwyzer.net/2007/05/15/falwell-part-one/#comment-23002</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 21:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/05/15/falwell-part-one/#comment-23002</guid>
		<description>Zuzu, I never said you have to be an enemy on the scale of Hitler to be considered an enemy.  I did suggest, however, that you have to be an enemy on the scale of Hitler to warrant comparison to ... oh, I don&#039;t know ... &lt;b&gt;Hitler???!!!&lt;/b&gt;  As to what constitutes an enemy more generally, I&#039;d say the person has to be motivated by animus against the person, as opposed to merely objecting to conduct that another person believes unobjectionable.  If you hate the sin but love the sinner, you may piss the sinner off in a big way, especially if he has a good-faith believe that his perceived sin isn&#039;t a sin after all, but you&#039;re not his enemy.  If you hate the sinner &lt;i&gt;and&lt;/i&gt; the sin (or, in the case of racism, hate the individual without any pretense of there being a sin), you are.

In Falwell&#039;s case, I hear a lot of obnoxious shrieking in this thread about how mean and eeeevvvvil the guy supposedly was, but I don&#039;t see anyone producing a shred of evidence that the guy wished ill on anyone.  At most, I see a spirited disagreement over what conduct should or should not be be classified as a sin.  Big difference.  If everyone who disapproved of anything I consider unobjectionable were considered my &quot;enemy,&quot; I&#039;d have nothing but enemies in the world, and the very word &quot;enemy&quot;  - along with the Biblical directive to love them - would lose any meaning whatsoever.

Speaking of enemies - the real kind, that is - get a load of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,273313,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;what the real enemies of gays&lt;/a&gt; think about Jerry Falwell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zuzu, I never said you have to be an enemy on the scale of Hitler to be considered an enemy.  I did suggest, however, that you have to be an enemy on the scale of Hitler to warrant comparison to &#8230; oh, I don&#8217;t know &#8230; <b>Hitler???!!!</b>  As to what constitutes an enemy more generally, I&#8217;d say the person has to be motivated by animus against the person, as opposed to merely objecting to conduct that another person believes unobjectionable.  If you hate the sin but love the sinner, you may piss the sinner off in a big way, especially if he has a good-faith believe that his perceived sin isn&#8217;t a sin after all, but you&#8217;re not his enemy.  If you hate the sinner <i>and</i> the sin (or, in the case of racism, hate the individual without any pretense of there being a sin), you are.</p>
<p>In Falwell&#8217;s case, I hear a lot of obnoxious shrieking in this thread about how mean and eeeevvvvil the guy supposedly was, but I don&#8217;t see anyone producing a shred of evidence that the guy wished ill on anyone.  At most, I see a spirited disagreement over what conduct should or should not be be classified as a sin.  Big difference.  If everyone who disapproved of anything I consider unobjectionable were considered my &#8220;enemy,&#8221; I&#8217;d have nothing but enemies in the world, and the very word &#8220;enemy&#8221;  &#8211; along with the Biblical directive to love them &#8211; would lose any meaning whatsoever.</p>
<p>Speaking of enemies &#8211; the real kind, that is &#8211; get a load of <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,273313,00.html" rel="nofollow">what the real enemies of gays</a> think about Jerry Falwell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuzu</title>
		<link>http://www.hugoschwyzer.net/2007/05/15/falwell-part-one/#comment-23001</link>
		<dc:creator>zuzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 16:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/05/15/falwell-part-one/#comment-23001</guid>
		<description>Bit disingenuous there, Xrlq.  Why does &quot;enemy&quot; have to be on the scale of Hitler to count?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bit disingenuous there, Xrlq.  Why does &#8220;enemy&#8221; have to be on the scale of Hitler to count?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://www.hugoschwyzer.net/2007/05/15/falwell-part-one/#comment-23000</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 11:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/05/15/falwell-part-one/#comment-23000</guid>
		<description>Really?  Do you have a transcript of some speech where Falwell called for 6 million gays to be exterminated?  Or a tape of the time he ordered terrorists to fly planes into buildings in the Castro District?  Or at least ordered a few murders of prominent gays here and there in hopes of starting a sexual orientation war?

If you&#039;ve got any such evidence, I&#039;d be interested in hearing it.  Otherwise, calling the guy an &quot;enemy&quot; in the sense of Hitler, bin Laden or Manson is beyond offensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really?  Do you have a transcript of some speech where Falwell called for 6 million gays to be exterminated?  Or a tape of the time he ordered terrorists to fly planes into buildings in the Castro District?  Or at least ordered a few murders of prominent gays here and there in hopes of starting a sexual orientation war?</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve got any such evidence, I&#8217;d be interested in hearing it.  Otherwise, calling the guy an &#8220;enemy&#8221; in the sense of Hitler, bin Laden or Manson is beyond offensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aphrael</title>
		<link>http://www.hugoschwyzer.net/2007/05/15/falwell-part-one/#comment-22999</link>
		<dc:creator>aphrael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 23:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/05/15/falwell-part-one/#comment-22999</guid>
		<description>XRLQ: I think it&#039;s entirely reasonable for members of the gay community to have perceived Rev. Falwell as our enemy. Whether it is appropriate to rejoice at the death of an enemy is another question entirely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>XRLQ: I think it&#8217;s entirely reasonable for members of the gay community to have perceived Rev. Falwell as our enemy. Whether it is appropriate to rejoice at the death of an enemy is another question entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aphrael</title>
		<link>http://www.hugoschwyzer.net/2007/05/15/falwell-part-one/#comment-22998</link>
		<dc:creator>aphrael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 23:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hugoschwyzer.net/2007/05/15/falwell-part-one/#comment-22998</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I still think it is always shameful to rejoice in the death of another human being, be it Jeffrey Dahmer or Adolf Hitler or al-Zarqawi or whoever is your personal villain.&lt;/em&gt;

Amen.

I occasionally allow myself to indulge in this vice; but, even when I do it, I know it to be wrong, and I feel guilty for doing so.

I am not sad that Reverend Falwell is dead. Indeed, I long considered him to be my enemy. But that does not make the rejoicing any less ugly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I still think it is always shameful to rejoice in the death of another human being, be it Jeffrey Dahmer or Adolf Hitler or al-Zarqawi or whoever is your personal villain.</em></p>
<p>Amen.</p>
<p>I occasionally allow myself to indulge in this vice; but, even when I do it, I know it to be wrong, and I feel guilty for doing so.</p>
<p>I am not sad that Reverend Falwell is dead. Indeed, I long considered him to be my enemy. But that does not make the rejoicing any less ugly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

