<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the road again&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hugoschwyzer.net/2008/01/15/on-the-road-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hugoschwyzer.net/2008/01/15/on-the-road-again/</link>
	<description>Author, Speaker, Professor, Shattering Gender Myths</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:44:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Hoover-Chicago</title>
		<link>http://www.hugoschwyzer.net/2008/01/15/on-the-road-again/#comment-17360</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Hoover-Chicago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/01/15/on-the-road-again/#comment-17360</guid>
		<description>Already voted for Mike Huckabee in the early voting here in Chicago...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Already voted for Mike Huckabee in the early voting here in Chicago&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jane</title>
		<link>http://www.hugoschwyzer.net/2008/01/15/on-the-road-again/#comment-17359</link>
		<dc:creator>jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 16:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/01/15/on-the-road-again/#comment-17359</guid>
		<description>Just came upon this site after reflecting upon the state of feminism after watching an ABC 20/20 story tonight about Amanda Knox and the muder of Meredith Kercher.  Throughout the broadcast, both 21 year old women were referred to as &quot;girls,&quot; and, in a couple of instances, as &quot;young girls.&quot;  It&#039;s interesting to me that young men of the same age are never referred to by news media as &quot;boys&quot; or &#039;young boys.&quot;  As a college teacher, I distributed a simple survey to my classes; the respondents ranged in age from 18 to 21.  The survey asked them what age range they thought of when someone was descbibed as either a &quot;young girl&quot; or a &quot;young boy.&quot;  Most respondents selected 18-25 yrs old as the age range for &quot;young girls,&quot; and 5 t0 10 years old as the age range for &quot;young boys.&quot;   I&#039;m really baffled about by these responses and how they position young women as non-adults and  young men as adults.  

I also hear and read all the diatribes against feminism and the argument that feminists hate men and that the issues feminists addressed decades ago no longer exist.  One issue has to do with labor equity, (and I don&#039;t mean here equal pay for equal work outside of the home, although this is an issue, as women are still payed considerably less than men are for the same kind of work).  What  I mean here is the distribution of domestic work and how persistently women are placed by, and perceived through, popular media as the cleaners, cooks and Dr. Mom&#039;s. (Have you heard of Dr. Dad?)  How many ads, for instance, feature men cleaning toilets, scrubbing floors, vacuuming carpets, serving meals?  Not many (if any).  How many ads show men taking care of women and children when they are ill?  Hmmmm. Let&#039;s think.  None!  Most ads for health aids show women caring for their husbands and children, as if they themselves could not (should not) get sick.  Or, in the case of some ads, husbands and children wreak havoc ion the house when a woman is too sick to care for them (this scenario is meant to be funny.)   And show me one Sensodyne commercial where a woman has a toothache and a man comes to her rescue with the product.  It&#039;s always the other way around.  Women are not supposed to get sick, or if they do they are usually shown miraculously overcoming their own afflictions in order to take care of their sick husband and children.   And then we have the whole slate of reality shows in which a cadre of beautiful women (&quot;girls&quot;) cut each others throats and whine and cry as they compete with each other for one man. (&quot;boy?&quot;  I think not.) This is not just silly, trifling stuff, but venues for keeping women in their &quot;place.&quot;  I mention all of this in response particularly to those who post on this site celebrating their &quot;anti-feminism,&quot; and those who claim that feminism is dead because there is no longer any need for it.  I really admire Hugo.  He as a lot of courage and integrity to state his enlightened views the way he does.  Thissite is a pure breath of fresh air.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just came upon this site after reflecting upon the state of feminism after watching an ABC 20/20 story tonight about Amanda Knox and the muder of Meredith Kercher.  Throughout the broadcast, both 21 year old women were referred to as &#8220;girls,&#8221; and, in a couple of instances, as &#8220;young girls.&#8221;  It&#8217;s interesting to me that young men of the same age are never referred to by news media as &#8220;boys&#8221; or &#8216;young boys.&#8221;  As a college teacher, I distributed a simple survey to my classes; the respondents ranged in age from 18 to 21.  The survey asked them what age range they thought of when someone was descbibed as either a &#8220;young girl&#8221; or a &#8220;young boy.&#8221;  Most respondents selected 18-25 yrs old as the age range for &#8220;young girls,&#8221; and 5 t0 10 years old as the age range for &#8220;young boys.&#8221;   I&#8217;m really baffled about by these responses and how they position young women as non-adults and  young men as adults.  </p>
<p>I also hear and read all the diatribes against feminism and the argument that feminists hate men and that the issues feminists addressed decades ago no longer exist.  One issue has to do with labor equity, (and I don&#8217;t mean here equal pay for equal work outside of the home, although this is an issue, as women are still payed considerably less than men are for the same kind of work).  What  I mean here is the distribution of domestic work and how persistently women are placed by, and perceived through, popular media as the cleaners, cooks and Dr. Mom&#8217;s. (Have you heard of Dr. Dad?)  How many ads, for instance, feature men cleaning toilets, scrubbing floors, vacuuming carpets, serving meals?  Not many (if any).  How many ads show men taking care of women and children when they are ill?  Hmmmm. Let&#8217;s think.  None!  Most ads for health aids show women caring for their husbands and children, as if they themselves could not (should not) get sick.  Or, in the case of some ads, husbands and children wreak havoc ion the house when a woman is too sick to care for them (this scenario is meant to be funny.)   And show me one Sensodyne commercial where a woman has a toothache and a man comes to her rescue with the product.  It&#8217;s always the other way around.  Women are not supposed to get sick, or if they do they are usually shown miraculously overcoming their own afflictions in order to take care of their sick husband and children.   And then we have the whole slate of reality shows in which a cadre of beautiful women (&#8220;girls&#8221;) cut each others throats and whine and cry as they compete with each other for one man. (&#8220;boy?&#8221;  I think not.) This is not just silly, trifling stuff, but venues for keeping women in their &#8220;place.&#8221;  I mention all of this in response particularly to those who post on this site celebrating their &#8220;anti-feminism,&#8221; and those who claim that feminism is dead because there is no longer any need for it.  I really admire Hugo.  He as a lot of courage and integrity to state his enlightened views the way he does.  Thissite is a pure breath of fresh air.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. K. Gayle</title>
		<link>http://www.hugoschwyzer.net/2008/01/15/on-the-road-again/#comment-17358</link>
		<dc:creator>J. K. Gayle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 11:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/01/15/on-the-road-again/#comment-17358</guid>
		<description>Hope you&#039;ve gotten to everything you&#039;d hoped to get to and more.  Sorry to do this to you, Hugo, but when you&#039;re back, you&#039;ll find &lt;a href=&quot;http://speakeristic.blogspot.com/2008/02/into-wild-at-kitchen-table.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;you&#039;ve been tagged&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope you&#8217;ve gotten to everything you&#8217;d hoped to get to and more.  Sorry to do this to you, Hugo, but when you&#8217;re back, you&#8217;ll find <a href="http://speakeristic.blogspot.com/2008/02/into-wild-at-kitchen-table.html" rel="nofollow">you&#8217;ve been tagged</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

