<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Early good news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/18/early-good-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/18/early-good-news/</link>
	<description>Author, Speaker, Professor, Shattering Gender Myths</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:44:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Schwyzer</title>
		<link>http://www.hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/18/early-good-news/#comment-14829</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Schwyzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 00:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/18/early-good-news/#comment-14829</guid>
		<description>Stentor&#039;s technically right.  What will make November 2008 different (&lt;em&gt;deo volente, baruch hashem, &lt;/em&gt;etc.) is that in a state where marriage is already a reality for same-sex couples, voters will be asked to either dissolve those marriages or embrace them.  And if they embrace them, as I suspect they will (by a narrow margin, natch), the religious right will have lost their key argument that the voters of a state had never given straight (sorry) approval to gay marriages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stentor&#8217;s technically right.  What will make November 2008 different (<em>deo volente, baruch hashem, </em>etc.) is that in a state where marriage is already a reality for same-sex couples, voters will be asked to either dissolve those marriages or embrace them.  And if they embrace them, as I suspect they will (by a narrow margin, natch), the religious right will have lost their key argument that the voters of a state had never given straight (sorry) approval to gay marriages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/18/early-good-news/#comment-14828</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 20:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/18/early-good-news/#comment-14828</guid>
		<description>Wait, by &quot;anti-marriage,&quot; did you mean &quot;against gay marriage?&quot;  If so, ignore that last message; I&#039;m too used to hearing this discussion through the &quot;pro-family&quot; dialect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, by &#8220;anti-marriage,&#8221; did you mean &#8220;against gay marriage?&#8221;  If so, ignore that last message; I&#8217;m too used to hearing this discussion through the &#8220;pro-family&#8221; dialect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/18/early-good-news/#comment-14827</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 20:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/18/early-good-news/#comment-14827</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;...we in Arizona defeated an anti-marriage ballot measure in 2006.&lt;/i&gt;

Arizona is a pretty standard red state.  California, not so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8230;we in Arizona defeated an anti-marriage ballot measure in 2006.</i></p>
<p>Arizona is a pretty standard red state.  California, not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stentor</title>
		<link>http://www.hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/18/early-good-news/#comment-14826</link>
		<dc:creator>Stentor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 19:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/18/early-good-news/#comment-14826</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;it looks like gay marriage is en route to its first ever victory at the ballot box.&lt;/i&gt;

Not so fast there -- we in Arizona defeated an anti-marriage ballot measure in 2006.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>it looks like gay marriage is en route to its first ever victory at the ballot box.</i></p>
<p>Not so fast there &#8212; we in Arizona defeated an anti-marriage ballot measure in 2006.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mermade</title>
		<link>http://www.hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/18/early-good-news/#comment-14825</link>
		<dc:creator>Mermade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 03:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/18/early-good-news/#comment-14825</guid>
		<description>Indeed! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed! <img src='http://www.hugoschwyzer.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Schwyzer</title>
		<link>http://www.hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/18/early-good-news/#comment-14824</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Schwyzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 02:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/18/early-good-news/#comment-14824</guid>
		<description>Indeed.  How often have progressives found a way to snatch defeat from near-certain victory? The tally of disappointments is great indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed.  How often have progressives found a way to snatch defeat from near-certain victory? The tally of disappointments is great indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/18/early-good-news/#comment-14823</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 02:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hugoschwyzer.net/2008/07/18/early-good-news/#comment-14823</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll believe that when I &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2004/nov/nov01.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;see it&lt;/a&gt;.  One can&#039;t be too pessimistic regarding politics, I always say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll believe that when I <a href="http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2004/nov/nov01.html" rel="nofollow">see it</a>.  One can&#8217;t be too pessimistic regarding politics, I always say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

