“Bowflex Boy” and Kristy McNichol: of celebrity, reality, sexiness and desire (reprint)

A reprint from July 2008.

There’s been an interesting discussion going on beneath this post at Feministe. As part of a riposte to some rather silly criticism of Third Wave, sex-positive feminism, Jill last week put up a number of pictures of hot shirtless men. (It’s reasonably work-safe to visit.)

Some commenters (both men and women) criticized the decision to put up the photos. They asked the usual questions: isn’t it reflective of a double standard if we denounce men for objectifying a narrow range of beautiful women, while celebrating when a feminist woman posts pictures of handsome, ripped, relatively young men? Isn’t it problematic to celebrate a narrow ideal when we live in a culture in which body dysmorphia and self-loathing is rising dramatically in the male population?

Jill responds to the criticism in this comment. When the question of poor male self-image is raised, some commenters leap in to make the perfectly legitimate case that all things considered, women today suffer far more from a culture that fetishizes a very narrow notion of perfection. That’s true enough, but the damage done to young men by our contemporary ideal of the “cut, be-sixpacked” physique is very real.

But this post is not an attempt to revive some sort of suffering Olympics discussion about male v. female body image issues. Rather, I’ve been thinking about something I learned twenty years ago about desire, the ideal, and insecurity. In college, I lived for a while in a co-op on the northside of the Berkeley campus. There were 37 of us in the house, nearly as many women as men. One of my best female friends in the house lived in a “single”, and I often visited with her in her room. (I had a triple for most of my time in the co-op). Debbie had a huge poster on her wall — an ad for the “Bowflex Man.” If you remember the ’80s, you remember the ad. I’ve done a Google image search, and can’t find it, but the picture is indelibly carved on my brain. A young, dark-haired man is pulling off his shirt, lifting his arms over his shoulders. His body beneath is tanned and spectacularly toned. A Bowflex machine is in the background. Half the dorm rooms on campus seemed to have this picture up; it was more popular than that college staple, Robert Doisneau’s kissing Parisian street couple. Here’s the picture: Bowflex Boy

Anyhow, Debbie had this picture in her room, over her bed. At one point, Debbie and I made a brief attempt at a romantic relationship. It lasted only a few weeks before we realized we were better off as friends. But I remember that when I was naked in her bed the first time, I couldn’t stop thinking about the image of masculine perfection just inches away. I was not terribly out of shape in college, but in both color and texture was a bit doughy around my middle. I certainly wasn’t “Bow-flex boy”. And after we had finished fooling around, as we lay in her very narrow single bed, I made a rather joking, obviously insecure remark. It’s been more than twenty years, so I don’t remember exactly how I put it, but it was something like “I can’t believe you want to be with me when you’ve got this guy to look at.”

Debbie sat up in bed, incredulous. She said — more or less: “For real, Hugo? That picture upsets you?” I told her no, not really, but it did make me feel, well a bit inadequate. Debbie laughed, not in a cruel way, and said something important: “Hugo, I like looking at beautiful bodies. He’s a gorgeous guy. But the fact that I think it’s beautiful, even the fact that I am attracted to the image, doesn’t mean that that is the only kind of man I can be attracted to.” I lay there for a moment, trying to figure out if I ought to be insulted, and she said something I do remember very clearly: “I can appreciate perfection without expecting it, and I can really be just as attracted to a normal body as to a perfect one.” I certainly knew I didn’t have a perfect body, and I didn’t expect her to tell me something ridiculous to the effect that I was just as sculpted as Bowflex Boy. What I wanted to hear was that i could “fall short of the mark” and still be wanted. And Debbie made it clear to me that an imperfect, human, “normal guy’s body” could still be very attractive to her.

We had a wonderful conversation that night. We each told the other what we found attractive in the other, and we confessed our particular insecurities and received some much-needed reassurance. I’d been sexually active since high school, but this was the first time I had talked openly with a lover about the difference between the attraction to an idol and the attraction to a real person. At one point, I said to Debbie something like, “So you’re telling me that you can have an aesthetic appreciation for a handsome model or actor but your real attraction is to something more real?” She snorted. “It’s more than ‘aesthetic appreciation’, Hugo. I can be sexually attracted to someone like Michael Biehn (“Aliens” star and Debbie’s favorite ‘crush’). I can think about having sex with him. But the fantasy about Michael Biehn or Bowflex man doesn’t mean that I expect to have that in real life. I’m not shocked when a guy I’m with isn’t like that, and I’m not disappointed.”

I’ve written about the problem of objectification before in various places. I take a fairly strong anti-porn line. I do believe that prolonged exposure to pornography can rob us of the capacity to be intimate. But at the same time, while I am certain that porn has a deleterious effect, I don’t think it shapes our libidos so completely as to render us incapable of responding to someone with a non porn-star body. Porn makes it easier for us to dehumanize each other, but it doesn’t cause someone to “only” be attracted to women with, say, 40DD breasts and a 26-inch waist. We are malleable, yes, but we’re not robots.

It is nearly impossible for any of us to disengage completely from the culture. In watching movies or television shows, we’re going to be exposed to celebrities whom we find very attractive. We know, of course, that their sexiness is carefully honed and cultivated; we know that the pictures we look at are airbrushed and retouched. From a critical justice standpoint, we ought to be asking questions out loud about how these images are selected and about the messages they send to all of us, young people in particular. We ought to push for more inclusiveness in every form — greater ethnic diversity as well as greater body-size and age diversity. But as we do this work, we’re still going to encounter men and women whose image we find satisfying, aesthetically pleasing, perhaps exciting, perhaps arousing. We were given eyes with which to delight, after all. Trying to avoid that pleasure is both impossible and silly.

The first pin-up I ever put on my wall was of Kristy McNichol. I had quite a thing for her when I was thirteen, and was able to find on the ‘net at least part of the picture I had up. (As best as I can remember after nearly thirty years.) I loved looking at McNichol’s picture. I did think about her sexually, of course, even though I had a rather inchoate and confused understanding of what that meant when I was thirteen. But more than anything else, I wanted an ideal on which to focus. She struck a chord with me when I was young, and I grasped on to that. Other stars would later strike the same chord, and though I never put posters on my wall of female stars after I left junior high school, I still had my “celebrity crushes.” But the point is simple: as powerful as these crushes were, like Debbie’s Bowflex fantasies, they never proved an obstacle to connecting with real women.

When I had my first sexual relationship in high school, I wasn’t horrified or alienated by the reality of my girlfriend’s body; I was awed by it in all of its uniqueness and complexity and wonder. Perfection would have been disappointing by comparison. A few years later, my friend Debbie reassured me that I was not the only one who could mark a distinction between a strong response to a beautiful image and the very real desire that could blossom for a very real person. Over the years, I’ve dated (and married) women who’ve had “things” for celebrities with gorgeous bodies; I’ve dated women whose exes have been professional athletes with physiques far more sculpted than mine. Whenever my own insecurities flared up — and they did continue to flare up into my early thirties — I reminded myself of Debbie and Bowflex Boy. We can admire perfection, we can eroticize an ideal image — and, at the same time, respond with great excitement to a flesh and blood person whose imperfections are often part of what enhances rather than suppresses our desire.

A month ago, I put up Jeanetta Calhoun’s “Mapping Desire” as a Thursday Short Poem. It’s worth concluding this post with that poem again, as it captures what it is I am trying to say here far better than I can in prose.

“i look like a roadmap,” he says,
intending, i suppose, to deflect
any unrealistic expectations of
the power of passing time on
a face i haven’t touched in years
but he is forgetting
how i love a road trip
sometimes screaming down the freeway
at 2 am, the bass thumping in the speakers
like the pounding of my heart
most often, though, i like to
take the side roads
roll the windows down
inhale the sweet smells
sheltered under the arching
bowers of trees linked
together like fingers of two hands
spanning what separates them
i like to slide into
a roadhouse on the county line
have a beer, some barbecue and
a slowdance to the blues
then unfold my beloved roadmap
run my finger along a chosen course
imagine all the s-turns and heaves
glory in the forgotten lanes
and remember that the end
of one journey is the
beginning of another.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

13 thoughts on ““Bowflex Boy” and Kristy McNichol: of celebrity, reality, sexiness and desire (reprint)

  1. Hugo- This post is awesome. The pressure both men and women feel sometimes to live up to a “Hollywood” image is amazing. And sure enough, most people are never going to live up to that (even if they do have bodies like bow flex man…the sheer amount of digital rendering, professionally applied make up, so on, so forth…well yes, often times it is quite interesting to see what actors and models look like when not being actors or models!) It is also pretty amazing to see how many people don’t really expect their partners to be perfect, and love them and being with them- imperfections and all… I mean, I have a Serious Thing for actor Vinny Jones…however, Mr. Evolution is a 5’10” fellow who used to play soccer….but now works at a desk and it shows…but I dig him anyway.

    Anyway, this post really made me grin and nod.

  2. Even if I liked nothing else about this post, I would love it for finding once more the picture of the Bowflex Boy, my first ever true purely sexual crush as a young teen. :) I gotta figure out a way to get a nice big reproduction of that poster…

  3. isn’t it reflective of a double standard if we denounce men for objectifying a narrow range of beautiful women, while celebrating when a feminist woman posts pictures of handsome, ripped, relatively young men?

    Yes, it is reflective of a double standard, but this particular double standard is not evil. Another one (actually a double reality, not just a double standard) is. The latter won’t even give the former a chance to become your real problem (except if you are one of those few guys who actually start having sex in high school, get voted the hottest teacher somewhat later, etc.)

    Lisa KS, you’ve been pwned. This guy is actually a contortionist. He is standing with his back towards the camera and his head is turned by 180 degrees. Nipples and navel were added later. ;)

  4. I’m certainly not trying to discredit your main points. I’m absolutely for a wide range of body acceptance. I agree that these ideals aren’t going to prohibit people from finding non-celebs attractive. I definitely think they prohibit us from connecting to others based on the ideal we set for ourselves. That is a shame.

    You mentioned a more severe ideal for women but I think it is worth elaborating on. Women are expected to be teeny tiny. Our bodies fight like crazy to hold on to ANY fat at all. As an example, I’m doing an intense training program to build muscle and lose fat. Several of my guy friends are following the same program. We’ve all started out at roughly the same starting point. We all had about the same amount of fat we’d like to lose, etc. We also all started out at about the same time. Me? I’ve been following a rather strict diet. They’ve been eating like regular gross college bros. I haven’t lost a single pound or changed much in terms of overall size(re: muscle/fat displacement hasn’t really occured). Most of them have had dramatic results. Their bodies just aren’t made to hold on to fat like mine is. Theirs are more inclined to build muscle mass, which in turn uses up energy stores even when they’re at rest.

    Guy ideals spring from what a lot of guys can reasonably manage if they put some work in to it. Ideals for women tend to be totally unattainable for the majority of us.

  5. So glad you relinked this on Facebook!! Yah!

    Like your friend Monica said in the FB thread, Debbie was totally right. And that bowflex guy is hottie mchot, and I’d do him in an instant, and I still can be attracted to guys who don’t look anything like that.

  6. This is really interesting to me. I’ve been using Second Life as a form of entertainment and relaxation as well as a social networking activity for some years.

    In Second Life, one can “buy” a shape and/or skin – the appearance that makes ones avatar presence in the “world”. Whilst there are communities of people who express their identities as animals, fairies, vampires and other mythical types, many people generally adopt either a male or female avatar shape and skin.

    It appears to be rare – very rare – for people to create avatars that are an accurate representation of themselves. I know for myself, I really enjoy – no, love – seeking out shapes and skins which define my aspirations to my particular standard of “beauty”. It’s an aesthetic thing I cannot shake! I consider myself a middle of the road feminist but when it comes to how I portray myself inside the world of Second Life, my shape and my skin are “perfect”. I am not short, chubby, have glasses or a double chin, I am tall, lithe, lusciously curvy and well proportioned! It’s a heady mix of vanity and aesthetic wonder!

    Interestingly, whilst the look I present in the world may engender frequent opening conversations with men, the longevity of these Second Life friendships are more often determined by the conversations we have – not my avatar look so much. I usually know after a few IM style conversations just which men are hooked into the “She’s hot” shallow interaction category and those who are more interested in developing intellectual and emotional rapport over the long term.

    I’m not particularly worried that I portray myself as someone “Gorgeous” and extremely physically beautiful inside Second Life. For me, it’s no worse than presenting ones avatar as a dog, a phoenix or a vampire! It’s a fantasy! A construct of the world of imagination. It has no bearing on any relationships formed with other real people behind other types of avatars. Communication with real people however, regardless of which world I’m in, is always the touchstone for connection and relationship.

  7. “Guys ideals spring from what a lot of guys can reasonably manage if they put some work in to it. Ideals for women tend to be totally unattainable for the majority of us.”

    You bring up a good point. As much as I enjoyed the “Of Never Feeling Hot” post for being so eye-opening and profound, I still ended up getting upset/angry about it…even asking to myself “BUT WHAT ABOUT TEH (“ugly”, “fat”, or downright “average”) WIMMENZ~!?” (on a FEMINIST SITE, no less!) It was a very bizarre knee-jerk Suffering Olympics action and I still feel conflicted about that post, because (even though Hugo EXPLICITLY SAID this shouldn’t be done) I’ve found yet another aspect of the male ego to stroke…but at the same time it made me wonder what I found attractive in “regular men”…I’ve never genuinely been into a real guy, only idol worship, most of the regular guys I meet bore me or I’m apathetic towards them unless they fulfill a random-ass preference of mine (either a tall, skinny goth/punk/what-have-you or a tall, well-built, jocky WASPY type (preferrably with blond hair)…or a short goth/punk/whatever because I can’t be with someone who is the same height as me (I’m 5’10”), either taller or shorter…God, I have some serious issues. >_>VV).

    Sorry for writing my life’s story.

  8. I absolutely agree that it would be false equivalence to suggest that the male and female ideals are equally unattainable. That said, the pain of falling short of the ideal is real enough for men to deserve comment (especially when framed as a personal anecdote.)

    And indeed, Casey, there are people out there whose “types” are more narrowly defined. Not ever having had an enduring physical “type” myself, I don’t particularly relate, but I know it’s real and it’s there.

  9. I also don’t like the fact that it’s much easier for me to appreciate the beauty of women of all races, sizes, shapes, and subcultures, and varying degrees of able-bodied-ness/disfigurement, whereas with men I’m just like, “meh, whatever, doesn’t tickle my fancy, so who gives a shit?”
    Oh yeah, and another one of my preferences are Asian guys. I’m kind of embarrassed at how obvious my attractions are forged from the fads I was into during my formative adolescent years (J-Rock/J-Pop, glam metal and pro-wrestling).

    I’d actually like to read a “follow up” of that article, maybe someday you could have some kind of discussion about not feeling desirable or (dare I say it?) sexy with the men in your classes for moar perspectives on this? (I feel like I’m asking too much >_<V)

  10. Guys ideals spring from what a lot of guys can reasonably manage if they put some work in to it.

    Are you fucking serious? Maybe you should stop trying to speak for other groups and check your privilege.

  11. I clicked the Real Adult Sex article in that link you left and I found this quote:
    “See, this isn’t exactly right. We can tell if another guy is attractive to us. Even if he doesn’t give us a boner. That’s not the point. The point is that, outside of maybe Brad Pitt, we don’t have much of an impression of which men are attractive to women.”

    That reminds me the times when I HAVE told a guy who/what I find physically attractive, they end up smashing my opinion and (defensively?) say “THAT’S STUPID, HE HAS A FACE LIKE A GECKO/BANANA/PAIR OF TESTICLES, HOW COULD ANYBODY FIND THEM ATTRACTIVE~?!” and it’s like, “why do I even bother saying anything?”

  12. BTW Hugo, I hate to double-post but the link you left me is also the first time I stumbled upon that article, and the comments section ended up sucking fast so I re-read your post then kinda fucked off.

Comments are closed.