Unlearning flirtation

From February 2007

I read a lotta blogs, and one I check in on from time to time is Amber’s. And a few weeks ago, she wrote a very brief, one-sentence post that brought me up short:

The deadpan flirtatiousness of certain married male bloggers is baffling to me.

Now, I was pretty damn certain Amber wasn’t thinking of me. I don’t know to whom she was referring, actually. But it made me reflect a bit about my past, about marriage, about neediness, and about unlearning flirtatiousness.

From early adolescence on, I was a student of flirting. I remember having the word defined for me in eighth grade by a girl named Jenny Nicholson. We sat together in math class, and I was a bit infatuated by her, a mild crush that was unreciprocated. But we chatted a lot, and one day she smiled and asked, in response to something I had said that I can’t remember, “Hugo are you flirting with me?” I said “no”, but obviously looked confused long enough for Jenny to throw out a definition: “It’s when you kinda like someone but don’t want to say it.”

I think I grunted out an “oh”, and left it at that.

I went home and asked my Mom about flirting. She gave me a more thorough definition, which I seem to remember as “Showing subtle romantic interest.” I also looked it up in a dictionary or two, and began to get the picture.

My mid-adolescent attempts at conscious flirting began not long thereafter, and they were predictably excruciatingly obvious, puerile, and unsuccessful. But my interest in girls was strong enough to help me overcome rejection after rejection, so I kept practicing what I thought of as my “technique.” I watched two of my older teenage male cousins, young men in college whose bodies were hard and chiseled and whose “patter” was smooth and (judging from their large number of girlfriends) successful. I watched their hand gestures, listened to their voices, studied their apparent effortlessness. Slowly, as my own body matured and changed, my confidence began to increase.

Bottom line, I spent years learning how to flirt. I suppose I only got good at it around the time I stopped consciously thinking about what I was doing and simply let myself “do what came naturally.” And for years and years, I did a hell of a lot of flirting. I flirted in and out of both of the disastrous marriages I had in my twenties. I found that my need for validation was stronger than any commitment I had made to any one particular woman. Even when I was physically faithful, I still loved the “intrigues” that had become second nature to me.

It was only in my early thirties, when I underwent my spiritual conversion, that I became willing to rethink my own flirtatiousness. Doing a written inventory of my romantic and sexual history, I realized that from 13 to 31 I had devoted a colossal amount of time and energy to flirting. The goal was rarely sex — the goal was validation of my own desirability. I was a first-rate narcissist, always eager to “stir the pot” to see if I could arouse a spark of interest in the various women I met in my life. It never mattered if I was single or attached, and I didn’t much care if these women were available or not. My ego needed feeding, and flirting was the best damn way I knew to get it fed. If the “intriguing” led to a short-term relationship or brief encounter, so much the better — but that was just icing on the cake. The “cake” in these instances was the knowledge that I was wanted. And knowing that I was desirable was the ultimate payoff.

I wrote last year about my 1998 “experiment with celibacy.” Not only did I not have sex or date, but for the first time since early adolescence, I consciously refrained from flirtations and intrigues. Cutting off that source of validation was extremely painful. I felt panicky and anxious. I was forced to do a lot of praying. And God was faithful. He brought me that sense of well-being that I needed so badly, that I had wanted so badly. My promiscuity and my addictive flirtatiousness had been all about filling a hole inside of me that only He could fill. But His grace could only fill that hole once I had made the decision to give up this habit that had sustained me and driven me for so long.

It’s been nearly nine years since that experience. And of course, I’m married once more, in a relationship that is deeper, richer, more challenging and more fulfilling than I have ever known. And finally, in this marriage, I can say that not flirting is truly second nature for me now. I still remember all of my old tricks, mind you. Even now, I often pause and examine my own words and actions to make sure that nothing I am doing or saying with any of the women in my life rises to the level of flirtation or intrigue. I’m gradually growing less hyper-vigilant as I learn to relax into my own skin. I’ve finally learned to stop using other people in order to feed that insatiable ego. And I’m finally in a marriage where all of those sparks, all of that heat, all of that “intrigue” is directed towards my spouse and my spouse alone.

Flirtation, particularly when we are married or in committed relationship, brings us dangerously close to one of the most pernicious sins of all. No, I don’t mean adultery. I mean the sin of using another human being to soothe our own anxiety, to feed our ravenous ego. Sending out “mixed messages” that arouse interest, deliberately fishing about to see if we can get a little “stroking” — this is toxic, manipulative, adolescent. I did it for nearly twenty years. It took several years more of hard work to break myself of the habit. Even now, I remain vigilant, knowing that it would be false pride to claim that I am forevermore immune from the temptation to soothe myself this way. Continue reading

Of webcams, long-distance relationships, and the misunderstanding of porneia

Here’s a new one.

Just before we left for Europe two weeks ago, I got an email from a young man named Josh. Josh is a Christian, and he and I have exchanged emails before about Christianity and a liberal sexual ethic. (See this post and this archive.) Josh and his girlfriend, Ruth, have been separated for the summer, and they’ve been talking on the phone and via webcam. Lately they’ve started having phone sex, and have been incorporating the webcam too, watching each other masturbate.

Josh writes that both he and Ruth like the webcam experience very much, but that they are also troubled. Each has a history of using internet porn, and both have committed to giving it up. (This is the moment to note parenthetically that in my work as a gender studies prof and sex educator I’ve been hearing lately from more and more young women who are troubled by their own porn use as well as that of their male partners. The evidence seems to be that we are moving closer to parity in terms of “consumption” of visual erotica by both sexes. I’m sure that there are studies out there on this. I report only my own “anecdata”.) Josh and Ruth dislike both the addictiveness of internet pornography and the ways in which it teaches the user to objectify and dehumanize the people whose bodies make up the images they view.

Josh and Ruth want to know how their private use of the webcam relates to pornography, as they sense that it is both troublingly similar to and yet in another way clearly distinct from the use of porn. Josh wanted my two cents.

When I first read Josh’s letter, I was reminded of a story I heard from my third ex-wife, Elizabeth, who taught for a while at Fuller Seminary. Elizabeth was mentoring a group of first-years, and leading a class on sexuality. One of the guys in the class confessed that he was having trouble getting lustful thoughts for his own fiancée out of his head. Elizabeth was stunned: the young man had made it all the way through a Christian college, BA in hand, and was now entering a Ph.D. program in psychology, and he didn’t grasp the colossal spiritual difference between lusting for someone with whom you are not in relationship and someone with whom you are. I need to give credit where credit is due; my ex-wife, who had a master’s in divinity, was very helpful to me in clarifying a progressive yet biblical perspective on lust. The tenth commandment (which deals with coveting) and Matthew 5:28 make it clear that lust is chiefly (and, arguably, only) problematic when it violates the bonds of covenant marriage. So when a married man lusts for a woman who is not his wife, or an unmarried man lusts for a married woman (reverse the sexes as you please), that’s a very real form of adultery. But when an unmarried man lusts for his unmarried fiancée, that’s hardly a violation of the covenant. When a single woman aches to be touched sexually by a single man, no adultery is committed.

My ex, whose Greek was better than mine, would at this point launch into an explanation of how porneia (the most commonly used Greek term for sexual immorality in the New Testament) ought never be translated as fornication (meaning pre-marital sex). Rather, she argued, it referred only to sex that was extra-covenantal (like incest as well as adultery). I’m not the NT scholar she was. The point is that her mentee had bought into a common misunderstanding of lust, and had concluded that all sexual desire was bad, even for one’s own girlfriend or boyfriend. Leaving aside the complicated question of the legitimacy of premarital sex, common sense makes it clear that sexual desire for a prospective spouse is a necessary, healthy, and good thing. Only a culture that has deeply distorted sexual values could confuse a prohibition against cheating on someone to whom one had pledged fidelity with lusting for someone with whom one planned to make that pledge! Continue reading