New columns at GMP and SRCC

By coincidence, I’ve got two columns up at two different places which touch on two different aspects of the same subject.

At the Good Men Project, where I’m very pleased to announce I am now a “featured columnist”, there’s Red Hot Monogamy.

And at the website for Sir Richard’s Condom Company (where I am to be a more regular writer), here’s We Touch Ourselves: Masturbation, Condoms, and the Justice of Pleasure

Read one after the other, these two pieces might seem contradictory. But they aren’t. We cannot give away what we haven’t got, the wise ones tell us, and before we can merge our sexuality with another, we do well to know passion for ourselves.

In any event, I’m getting ready for my lecture on Kabbalah for Christians tonight in Rio (with another lecture to follow Thursday in Sao Paulo.) I’ve been holed up in a hotel room working today, but have a full day of sightseeing planned for tomorrow, led by two new carioca friends.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

“Hugo Schwyzer sounds like someone out of a Quentin Tarantino movie”

I’m safely in Rio de Janeiro. Exhausted and jet-lagged; because I was redeeming miles for this trip, I flew L.A.-Detroit-Sao Paulo-Rio. 30 hours of traveling.

The Young Turks, whom I only recently discovered took my debut column at the Good Men Project (reprinted at Alternet) and used it for a discussion of men, women, and “settling” on their show. Check out the Youtube video.

And I want to tell Cenk Uyger how much I loathe Tarantino.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

Southbound

If you can read this, you know where I’m going to be next week and what I’m going to be doing. I will be indeed be leaving for Brazil this Sunday the 6th, returning on Monday the 14th.

I will try and post from South America, and my now-regular columns at the Good Men Project and Healthy is the New Skinny will appear as scheduled on Tuesday and Thursday, respectively.

Speaking of the Good Men Project, I’m pleased that my most recent piece was picked up by Alternet. One key thing got left on the cutting room floor: I know that by far the biggest reasons women are more likely to leave heterosexual marriages than men are (in no particular order): domestic violence, infidelity, and an uneven physical and emotional distribution of household duties. My point in the post was that even if we take all of those things off the table (and there are marriages where there is no hitting, no name-calling, no cheating, and a roughly egalitarian approach to housework), women are still more likely to leave. As it stands, it looks as if I’m ignoring some key issues, and that needed clarifying.

See ya on the other side.

The Cautery of Hate: on Breakups, Psychoanalysis, and the Healing Power of Rage

I was reminded of this story by an exchange with a friend today.

Dealing with the end of an intense romantic relationship is painful, regardless of the terms on which that relationship took place. Whether an unrequited obsession or a marriage, the adjustment to life without that one other person on whom you were so focused for so long is very difficult. And especially when we’ve had a hard time seeing a lover’s flaws, recovery may call for a period where we zero in on nothing but those shortcomings.

The story:

Many years ago, during one of my intermittent attempts to get sober, I went into analysis. Yeah, old school Freudian analysis, four days a week for an hour at a time. My psychiatrist, who had gone through the Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Institute, had me on the couch in his Pasadena office for nearly two years. My grandmother footed the bill. But when we made the family decision to put me through the famed Freudian process, it was my mother who told me about a dear friend of hers — another psychiatrist — whose own daughter had gone into analysis (with another doctor, of course, not her mother.) My mother’s friend had told her daughter, “Boopsie, at some point during this process you will realize that you hate me. Don’t worry, the hate won’t last. But it’s a necessary stage in analysis.”

“Don’t be silly, Mom, the day could never come when I’d hate you!”, Boopsie replied.

Six months later, the phone rang. When my mother’s friend answered, she heard her daughter’s voice: “Mom”, Boopsie said, “I just want you to know… it’s that day. I hate you.” Click.

Several weeks later, of course, the phone rang again. “Mom, I just want you to know, I don’t hate you anymore”, Boopsie announced with pride. Her mother laughed with her, and they cried together.

And yeah, I went through the same thing with my own mother.

But it’s not just Freudian analysis with its high price tag that produces this process of progressing from idealization to angry contempt and then on to loving acceptance. It’s also part of a good breakup, as I discovered not long after I began the analytic journey.

As I’ve often written, early on in my teaching career I went through a period where I dated and slept with many of my students. Though all these relationships were consensual, at least in the legal sense, they were also deeply unethical. And while some were one-night stands, some lasted on-and-off for months, and in a couple of cases, over a year. One of the latter relationships was with a young woman named Tanya, whom I slept with on and off from late 1996 to early 1998. I was a complete jerk to Tanya, not only because our relationship had started when I was her professor, but also because she was someone who wanted an exclusive romantic relationship with me, something I had neither the willingness nor the ability to give at that turbulent and self-absorbed point in my life. As far as I was concerned, Tanya and I were “friends with benefits”. And yet my conscience wasn’t so drugged and numbed that it didn’t know damn well I was taking advantage of her feelings for me.

Finally, in early 1998, Tanya told me that it was too painful to continue to sleep with me when I could give her nothing more than sex, affection and conversation. If I couldn’t commit, she told me, she’d need to stop seeing me altogether. She also told me she was starting therapy, and was excited about where that would take her. Since I was, at this point, on dear Dr. Levine’s couch Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, and Friday afternoons, I was all about therapy, and told Tanya I was excited for her. Continue reading

Thursday Short Poem: Barenblat’s “The Psalm I Sing”

I’ve had a couple of poems by Rachel Barenblat on past TSPs. Rachel, who blogs at the Velveteen Rabbi, just published her first full volume of poetry, and it’s extraordinary: 70 Faces: Torah Poems. (You can buy it through the publisher or through Amazon). The poems are tied to the weekly parashot (Torah readings) from the five books of Moses: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. Rachel is a rabbi as well as a poet, but these poems aren’t just for Jews; they are for anyone raised with even a passing familiarity with these foundations stories of Western culture. I’ve known these stories all my life, first as an atheist, then as a Christian, now as a Christian who studies Kabbalah. And these short poems resonate deeply with me, as I suspect they will with many who come out of Jewish, Christian, or Muslim backgrounds.

My daughter’s full name is Heloise Cerys Raquel Schwyzer. Raquel is Rachel, her Hebrew name; she was given it during a Saturday morning Torah reading by our rabbi at the Kabbalah Centre in Los Angeles. And she was given it on Beshalach, the parashat that includes the story from Exodus of the parting of the Red Sea and the destruction of Pharoah and his army. It is a beautiful and terrible story with countless interpretations, and includes the very famous “Song of the Sea.”

So for my daughter Rachel, a poem from my friend Rachel for Beshalach.

The Psalm I Sing (Beshalach)

I don’t want to sing to the Lord
who has triumphed gloriously
horse and driver hurled into the sea.

I don’t want to say
this is my God and I will enshrine him
the God of my father, and I will exalt him

not if that means celebrating
when the floodwaters or the bombs
have left their bodies bent and bloodied

even if they were cruel taskmasters
even if they hit us first
even if they are not like us at all

the psalm I sing says
God does not turn God’s back
on any part of creation

the psalm I sing says
the God who plays favorites
does not find favor in my eyes

I praise God who thundered at the angels
for daring to rejoice
when God’s children were drowning

God who demands we wake up
face what we have permitted
bandage the bleeding with our own hands.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

Give for Lila: one way to defend Planned Parenthood

Lila Rose is at it again. She’s released another heavily edited and deeply misleading video designed to delegitimize the good and important work of Planned Parenthood. In the latest incident, Rose (a student here in Los Angeles and a pro-life activist since her early teens) attempted to catch PP employees turning a blind eye to an underage prostitution ring. Their plan failed when Planned Parenthood reported the ring to the FBI, doing exactly what Rose had hoped they wouldn’t do.

Lila Rose works often in conjunction with right-wing activist James O’Keefe, who was convicted of breaking into Democrat Mary Landrieu’s office in an attempt to uncover dirt on Louisiana’s senior senator. It’s worth noting that Rose attends UCLA, home of a famous film school where fantasies are nurtured and brought to life. (And where I got my Ph.D. Um, Go Bruins.)

As regular readers know, I’m a strong Planned Parenthood supporter. I’m giving this month in the name of Lila Rose, and asking others to join me. When you donate through the PP site, go to the section for “honorary giving” and add in the name “Lila Rose.” Send Lila a cordial email at lilarose@liveaction.org or let her know of your donation on her Facebook page. And yes, I do mean cordial: please, nothing threatening or demeaning. Though she’s created a high profile for herself through slick and dishonest means, she is — like so many whom Planned Parenthood serves — a young woman deserving of respect and dignity. No personal attacks, please: just remind her she’s raising money for a cause she abhors.

Let’s send Lila (and her backers) the message that her disinformation campaign only serves to increase our commitment to women’s health. Let’s do with civility towards our opponents, and with a relentless commitment to justice.

Join me. Give to Planned Parenthood in the name of Lila Rose.

Impressing other men

I connected with Holly Kearl at last November’s NWSA conference in Colorado. Holly is the author of Stop Street Harassment: Making Public Places Safe and Welcoming for Women, an invaluable analysis both of harassment and of the various strategies we can use to stop it. Holly is also a fellow marathoner, and during the conference, she and I slipped away for a quick seven through the frozen streets of Denver. While she ran me off my feet, I got the chance to hear more about her important work.

And yes, Holly is available to speak on a variety of topics. Read a great two-part interview with her here and here.

Holly also runs the Stop Street Harassment blog. On Wednesdays, it features short pieces by male allies. Today, my first short piece is up: Street harassment is about one thing: impressing other men.