Heading east

I’m getting ready to leave town, flying out to New York on a red-eye tonight. I’ll be on the east coast all next week for a variety of reasons both spiritual and academic; a week hence, I’m the guest speaker at Brown University’s “Consent Day”. The event is open only to the Brown community, and I’ll be speaking on “Negotiating Consent and Myths of Male Weakness”. I’m also planning to do a workshop with a male-only group after my talk.

It should be noted that I am available to give this presentation elsewhere; it’s gone very well in the past and I have high hopes for next week in Providence. If you’re a college or university looking for a guest speaker to talk about men and feminism or issues around consent, I’d love to chat about the possibilities. Email me at hbschwyzer@gmail.com

In any case, this means that posting will be light to non-existent over the next ten days or so, though some reflections on the Brown event will certainly be forthcoming.

Home again, and giving thanks for Britain

We’re home from a fortnight in the UK. My wife and I took Heloise and my wife’s mother with us on the trip; for the latter two, it was their first visit to Britain. (Our daughter was in my wife’s tummy when we were in Europe last summer, but no passport was required at that point.) The ratio of three adults to one infant is a good one for travel, and we’re blessed with a daughter who is an easy flyer. (I’m proud to say that the Cabin Service Director on our BA flight to Heathrow called her “the little angel” as we got ready to deplane.)

I took everyone to visit Kingston Lisle, the tiny Oxfordshire village in the Vail of the White Horse where my father grew up. We knelt at the graves of my paternal grandparents (noting that we need to hire someone to redo the headstones), stayed at a glorious hotel in nearby Great Milton, and enjoyed the Cotswolds before heading on to Carmarthenshire, Devon, and Cumbria. We took my English nephew to see his hometown side, Exeter City, play their first home match of the season. And we finished the trip in the glorious Lake District, which was the only place where we dealt with rain.

My father, born in Vienna and, from the age of three, raised as a war refugee in England, had four children. My younger brother decided years ago that he felt more at home in Britain than in America; he and his family make their home in Exeter, where my brother is now associate professor of English. My two nephews and my niece are growing up with Devonian accents; they are culturally English. My sister Elizabeth lived and worked in Britain for nearly a decade before returning home two years ago; my youngest sister and I have never lived for any great length of time in the UK, but visit regularly. All four of us have two passports; each of us feels a different degree of connection to that “green and pleasant land.”

My love for Britain isn’t rooted in ethnic heritage; on my mother’s side, I’ve got some ancestors from that sceptered isle, but far more from the continent. The love I have is rooted in many things, but perhaps most plainly in my family’s history. My paternal grandmother, Elisabeth von Schuh, was born in Vienna to a Jewish mother and a Catholic father; her husband, Georg Schwitzer (the spelling would later be changed) was born Jewish but converted to Catholicism when he married. My father was uncircumcised and baptized, but was ethnically 3/4ths Jewish; that latter fact would have meant a death sentence for him and the rest of the family following Hitler’s takeover of Austria in 1938. My grandfather, a gentle physician, wasn’t eager to leave; like many, he thought things wouldn’t “get that bad” for Viennese Jews (who were used to anti-Semitism as a political prop.) My late grandmother knew better, and she explored every avenue she could to get the family out.

It was Great Britain that welcomed in my father’s family. Not the USA (my grandmother tried that option). Not France (lucky, too, given what would happen to French Jews during the war.) The only door that opened was for Britain, which was willing to take certain Jewish professionals, especially doctors. The family escaped just before the outbreak of World War Two, and after a brief period in London, settled in what was then Berkshire and is now Oxfordshire, in a place called Fawler Manor just outside of Kingston Lisle. Though my grandfather was briefly interned as an enemy alien, he was eventually released and allowed to practice medicine. While my grandmother and her children stayed in the south, he went to work as the staff doctor at the refinery in Ellesmere Port, Lancashire — where he would die in a car accident in 1947.

It was the English who cared for my family before, during, and after the Second World War. My father left England at 24 to go to graduate school at Berkeley, but England never left him. The fundamental decency of that culture stayed with him all his life. He lived 47 years in the USA, but never got an American passport — he only wanted one citizenship, that of the one country that had opened its door and saved his family from the worst mass murder in human history. His California-born children all got their UK passports as soon as they could, and we all use them with varying frequency; we honor our father and we honor the land that became his home.

It was the British (the Scots are as British as any) who gave the Lockerbie bomber his compassionate release this week. Whether it was deserved in this case is debatable, but it is worth noting that compassionate release for the terminally ill is far more common in the United Kingdom than in the States (or anywhere else I know of). While the American attitude tends to be “let the man rot”, or more commonly, “fry his ass”, the attitude of at least a plurality of Britons is far more humane. And I see a direct link between the compassionate release of Abdelbaset al Mograhi this week and the compassionate welcome my father’s family received nearly seven decades ago. My family were escapees from mass murder rather than agents thereof, but the decency that undergirds the very existence of the concept of compassionate release was the same impulse that saved my father’s life.

Could I live in Britain? Perhaps. Not in London, which I find delightful but exhausting. To quote Cerys Matthews, the sublime and lovely Welsh pop star for whom my daughter is only partly named, “I come alive/outside the M25″ (the ring road around the capital.) I love the northeast, particularly Durham and Northumbria, but my brother’s location in the southwest makes a good case for a second home there. But perhaps, like my Dad, I am destined to spend the majority of my life in the once Golden State, making regular visits to somewhere greener, somewhere wetter, somewhere somehow just a bit kinder.

In any case, it’s good to be back. More blogging to come soon.

Assorted daddy thoughts

My wife, daughter, mother-in-law and I spent a very happy weekend in New York. We saw family and friends and kept ourselves very busy. I didn’t start visiting Manhattan regularly until a decade or so ago — and now, increasingly, I see it as somewhere I could live. (My dear wife would embrace that idea very eagerly.) The pace at which things happen is indeed satisfactory, and the fear of boredom is allayed in so many countless ways by that marvelous city.

It was the baby’s first long plane ride, and if I do say so myself she and her carers acquitted themselves splendidly. I now consider myself an old hand at wrangling strollers down jet ways and changing diapers in the lavatory in the midst of not-inconsiderable turbulence. My wife and I arranged our meals to be served separately, so that one could hold Heloise while the other ate. And oh, the blessing of a happy baby whose delicate ears are untroubled by landings and takeoffs. Heloise barely cried at all, and spent most of her waking time charming the FAs and her fellow passengers. (We are lucky parents, we know.)

I’ve got a post or two about feminist co-parenting (from the limited perspective, of course, of a first-time papa to a not-quite five-month old) in the hopper. For now, let me say simply how much I love being a father. There is nothing singular about this experience I’m having; many of my readers have had it or are having it, some many times over. But my goodness, what an extraordinary delight this girl is! And how extraordinary too to discover in myself reservoirs of patience and energy that I had no idea existed, reservoirs that might have gone untapped had my wife and I not had this little girl. Continue reading

Off until Monday

I’ll be away from the blog until Monday morning. My littlest sister is getting married up in Santa Barbara this weekend, and we’ll be gathering together in and around that city of my birth for the next few days. Heloise Cerys is two months old today, and we leave this afternoon for her first “road trip.” Ingmar the Volvo is packed to the gills, the hotel has already confirmed a crib in the bedroom, and we’re ready to embark with joy and a tiny degree of trepidation on another “first.”

Comments may languish in moderation longer than usual as a result. Your famous forbearance, my readers, is appreciated.

Of dreams and fathers: Barack Obama, growing up abroad, baseball, cricket, and daddies

Among the various books I read on our trip to New Zealand was Barack Obama’s Dreams from my Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance. I’d put it off for some time, but started it on the long flight down to Auckland and finished it in a Sydney hotel room. It’s the best book I’ve read by a president (or president-elect), and I’ve at least glanced at most of what our recent office-holders have produced. (I tried to read Bill Clinton’s massive autobiography, but ended up getting overwhelmed by detail, and skipped about.)

It’s not original to note that Barack Obama is an extraordinary figure, absolutely unlike anyone we’ve ever seen in American politics — at least, absolutely unlike anyone who has risen so far, so fast. Dreams from my Father, which is all the more powerful because it seems to be written by a man without any conscious sense that his words might be used against him someday, reveals Obama to be more exceptional than I had previously imagined.

It would be a bit ridiculous to say that I identify with our president-elect. I not only have not achieved what he has achieved, I have not had to overcome the obstacles he has had to overcome. (Though addiction and mental illness posed challenges that my socio-economic and ethnic circumstances did not.) But all good autobiography contains universal themes; we all have parents, after all, about whom we have often mixed feelings. Many of us struggle to discern a purpose and direction for our lives, and go through a quarter-life crisis of confidence. Barack Obama’s journey, in a broad sense, is a common one, though in its specifics it is both unique and jaw-droppingly impressive.

One of the things that I like best about Obama is that he has lived abroad; indeed, more than any other president in recent memory, he spent a significant portion of his childhood outside America (in Indonesia). Obama doesn’t hold dual citizenship as I do, and despite the slurs of a handful of ignoramuses, his devotion to the United States is unquestioned by any serious person. But he has tasted living abroad, and not only doing so, but doing so in comparative poverty. Not all international experience is the same. It’s one thing for the scion of a wealthy family to do a junior year at the Sorbonne, living off parent’s money; it’s another thing altogether to live as Obama did as a child, playing with street children in rural Indonesia. Anyone who is going to make claims for American exceptionalism ought to have had some first-hand experiences of living in — and not just visiting — other parts of the world. Though the child is not always the father of the man, reading Obama’s biography makes me hope that it will be so, particularly in regards to how he thinks about America’s place in the world. Continue reading

Home from the Antipodes

I’m back in the office on a crisp Monday morning; Advent is upon us. We’ve got two more weeks of teaching and a week of finals; I give my last exam on December 18 and then enjoy some freedom until January 12.

My wife and I returned yesterday afternoon from a trip to Australia and New Zealand. In the former country, we spent a mere two days in Sydney, but enjoyed a lengthier stay on the South Island of the latter. New Zealand is as gorgeous and welcoming as advertised, and the recent resurgence of the US dollar was immensely helpful to us as we traveled about. We spent Thanksgiving in a little lodge just outside of Kaikoura, two hours north of Christchurch. No turkey for us, of course, though we missed our kith and kin.

I gave a lecture on Kabbalah and Christianity to a small audience at the Crowne Plaza hotel in central Auckland on Saturday night, and on Sunday, before heading to the airport, had a coffee with my cyberfriend John Fox. John was one of my very first commenters at my old blogspot place; he’s been a steady reader since 2003. It was a delight to meet him in person, and chat about the state of the Anglican Communion and the new NZ prime minister, amongst other topics.

And I can now say that not only have I set foot on all seven of the world’s continents, I have gone for a run on all seven. My late uncle Peter was part of that small and mad group who have done marathons on all seven (including the great frozen one in the south); I cannot say the same, having confined all my distance work to the USA and Europe. But when we were in Antarctica in January, I jogged — for about ten minutes — up and down an icy hill. Last week, I went for a run around the Sydney Harbour, and can now claim to have strutted my proverbial stuff on each continent. My wife, I should note, has had a very busy year: she has been on all seven continents in 2008 alone, which is impressive. Fear not; carbon credits for all of this flying about have been purchased.

We’re going to be homebodies for a bit; the longest trip we have planned for December is a drive up to Northern California over the Christmas break. Lectures need giving, papers need grading, book proposals need still further revamping, chinchillas need feeding, and — certainly not least in importance — the house needs decorating for the season.

More soon.

Election eve, with prayerful and (almost) fearless predictions

My wife and I spent the weekend down in Mexico City. Though we’ve spent a bit of time in South America (many visits to her mother’s native Colombia, as well as Chile and Argentina), we hadn’t gone to Mexico yet together. And though I did some missions work in a small village in southern Sinaloa for a few consecutive summers, I had never been to what is by far the largest city in North America. According to my mother (in a rare moment of “TMI”), I was conceived in a Mexico City hotel room sometime in August, 1966. So for those who hold that life begins at conception, Hugo Schwyzer embarked upon this journey of life south of the border.

In any event, we had a wonderful time. We stayed in a small, spare, painfully hip boutique hotel in the Polanco district, but spent as much time as possible touring about. We both adored Coyoacan and the Kahlo/Rivera museums, as well as wandering through neighborhoods like San Angel and the stunning Chapultepec park. And of course, we were in town for Dia de los Muertos. My Spanish is getting better, but I still rely too heavily on my wife to do the translating. I’ve got the “Rosetta Stone” Spanish DVDs sitting at home, waiting for an as-of-yet non-existent free hour.

Folks, there will be only election-related posts through Wednesday. “Regular” blogging to resume by the end of the week. My endorsements are here.

Four years ago, I posted this the day before George W. Bush was re-elected: God, Voting, and Election Eve. I re-read it this morning, and winced when I read these lines:

I’m also increasingly optimistic about the chances of a Kerry victory. My own electoral college prediction (why not, it’s free) is that Kerry wins 284-254. Bush will concede on Friday of this week, I imagine. The Democrats will have a net gain of one Senate seat, or so I predict.

I was a lousy, and very disappointed, prognosticator. And it is once again election eve, and one very clear instinct within me says “For heaven’s sakes, Hugo, don’t make any more predictions. You jinxed it last time.” As the New York Times reported a couple of days ago, liberals across the country are tying themselves into knots of anxiety; from Berkeley to Braintree, Ann Arbor to Austin, we lefties are united as much in our longing for an Obama victory as we are in our not entirely unreasonable fear that “something” will happen (as it did in Florida in 2000, or Ohio in 2004), to dash all of our hopes.

I’ve worked hard in my life to overcome my supersititiousness and magical thinking. What socks I wear, what inanimate objects I clutch, what phrases I mindlessly recite will have no bearing on the outcome of sporting events or elections. What matters is how I vote, and the degree to which I am able to provide time, money, or inspiration to the campaigns in which I believe. And predicting doom, while it may serve to provide some grim satisfaction when and if the nightmare comes true, is no way to get through life.

So here’s my sensibly optimistic prediction for tomorrow’s election. Continue reading

A rambling post about patriotism and “home”

Sudy recently returned from a long working trip to the Philippines. (I visited, very briefly, in January.)

She reflects on her love for America:

In my years as a social justice and human rights advocate, I have never uttered the phrase out loud: “I love my country.” There are too many things I’ve seen to be able to say that phrase out aloud without qualifying what exactly it is that I love when there are so many things I can’t stand. But, inside, I have a deep love for my country despite all the tragedy, sin, mistakes, and horrible history of slavery, war, and cowboy politics…

In my work with other social justice advocates, they remain hostile to their citizenship and the stars and stripes. They balk at the soaring bald eagle and roll their eyes at the fireworks on the 4th of July. I remain silent, wondering how to both love and resist your citizenship.

Sudy notes that in other countries, far more self-described progressives seem to have an easier time expressing patriotic feeling, presumably because their nations wield less might.

Her post had me thinking about my own mixed feelings about America. Like Sudy, I am torn. When I watched the Republican convention last night, and heard the crowd burst into a spontaneous chant of “USA! USA! USA!”, I did indeed roll my eyes. I didn’t watch the Democratic convention (I was out of the country), but would have had the same response. It’s not just my presumption about the politics of those chanting it, it’s the implication of superiority I hear in the chant itself.

I realize I’m a bit of a caricature. A forty-something Berkeley-educated, Volvo-driving, NPR-listening, Pilates-doing, vegan gender studies professor on his fourth marriage is the sort of person easy for conservatives to ridicule. (Actually, I’m pretty easy for people across the political spectrum to ridicule, but let that pass.) I also have something most Americans don’t have, which is a second passport. Though on my mother’s side I’m a sixth-generation Californian and a thirteenth-generation American, my father was an Austrian war refugee raised in England. I have, as a result, two citizenships and two passports. (I travel on both, following the “shortest line” rule.) And in a real sense, it means multiple allegiances. Continue reading

Home and happy

At long last, I am home and getting ready to return to blogging. The fall semester starts next Tuesday, and I am energized and excited about the term to come.

My wife and I spent the last two and a half weeks in Europe. Some public Flickr pictures are here. I haven’t gotten around to labelling them, alas.

This trip was about a mixture of sentiment and service. Since 2006, each of us has lost a father, and we had a strong desire to visit the land of our paternal ancestors. My father was born in Vienna, Austria; my wife’s paternal grandparents were emigres from Croatia. As different as our heritages are on our maternal sides, both my wife and I share a common paternal link to the lands of the old Austro-Hungarian empire.

I hadn’t been to Vienna to visit family and see my Dad’s hometown since 2000. It was wonderful to be back in my favorite European city, beloved mostly because of its familiarity. My German was painfully rusty but still marginally serviceable, and I was able to show my bride some of the unique treasures of that city. My father’s family had fled Vienna in 1938, after Hitler’s annexation of Austria. Ethnically Jewish but nominally Catholic, their conversions and baptisms were no defense against Nazi notions of racial purity. They spent the war and the years afterwards in England, but by 1960 my father had emigrated to the States while my grandmother and her daughter returned to Vienna. Other family members, including both of my paternal great-grandmothers, died in the Shoah. And while some of the descendants of the murdered could never live happily in Austria again, most of my family chose to do so. Despite what was done 70 years ago, I feel very much at home there.

We then moved on to Croatia, spending time in the two great World Heritage sites of Split and Dubrovnik. My wife’s paternal grandmother was born in a little town called Bribir, northeast of Split and inland from the Dalmatian coast. (The nearest city of size is Sibenic.) We hired a driver to take us to Bribir (he had to look it up on a map), and we spent a moving hour walking through the tiny old town and visiting the historic archaeological site (dating back to Roman times) on the hill overlooking the community. The region is still clearly scarred by the war of the early 1990s; our driver told us that Bribir had been largely destroyed in fighting between Croats and Serbs. Many of the villages had been ethnically cleansed, and it was haunting to drive by so many burned out and bombed out houses that, fifteen years on from the fighting, have not yet been rebuilt. In both Vienna and Bribir, my wife and I felt the haunting touch of a history of genocide on our shoulders.

Dubrovnik, where my father’s parents honeymooned in 1927, was as magnificent as advertised.

The last of the heritage stops on our European trip was in Belgium, where we visited some dear friends of ours in Antwerp. On my mother’s side, I have Flemish roots — my great-great-great grandfather had been born in Bruges before emigrating to England. We toured Antwerp and Bruges, and for the first time in a while, I “broke vegan” to consume both dairy and eggs in the form of an enormous Belgian waffle.

We finished up in London, where we saw more friends and where I gave a lecture to nearly 100 people at the Kabbalah Centre. We flew home yesterday, and we were back in time to hear all of Barack Obama’s speech, about which perhaps I will have more to say later.

In any event, it is good to be home. I am looking forward to an autumn of good teaching and good blogging. And though the heat is still on here in Southern California, I can sense that fall is just around the corner. Fall is my happiest time of year, as it is for many of my friends. I look forward to being back in the blogosphere, wrestling again with issues large and small.

But for now, I am going to drag my jet-lagged body out for a much-needed run. Perhaps McCain will have announced his pick for veep by the time I get back.

Loving the whole earth, loving the single place: a long response to Gregory Rodriguez, quoting Abbey and Hauerwas

I normally like the perspective that L.A. Times’ columnist Gregory Rodriguez takes. But he wrote an op-ed eleven days ago that really irked me: Rootless to a Fault. Here’s a portion of it:

Here in the U.S., highly skilled workers and wealthy entrepreneurs from around the globe contribute mightily to this nation’s productivity and creativity. Their presence in our cities, and ours in theirs, has fostered a greater appreciation of global cultural diversity. It has spawned a vibrant cosmopolitanism that broadens our collective concern for people who live beyond our borders.

But this cosmopolitanism is not without its dark side. Increasingly, many of our big cities’ creative elites — both native and foreign-born — see themselves as citizens of the world. Our intellectuals are exploring the declining significance of place in the new globalized world order. And this brave new world cries out for an answer to the question: Does a person who swears loyalty to all cities and nations have any loyalties at all? I’ve always been struck by the fact that the same people who rightly criticize multinational corporations for having no sense of responsibility to place never seem to express the same concern about the equally “unplaced” creative elite.

A few years ago, I was at a fancy dinner party and found myself the only one at the table who held only one passport.

Rodriguez goes on to make a jarringly wrong premise: those who see themselves as “citizens of the world” are somehow dramatically less engaged in civic activity than those whose horizons are smaller and whose loyalties more narrowly defined. He opines:

Without denying the benefits of globalization, we should remember the beauty and strength of parochialism.

It’s all well and good to love the world, but real social solidarity is generally found on a smaller scale. And it’s not just the unskilled immigrants we should be concerned about. We need to find ways to encourage the highly skilled ones to form a sense of attachment and commitment to their new homes. On top of that, we natives must remember that there is no honor in escaping engagement by becoming a citizen of the world.

First off — and I could be wrong — I smell a tiny whiff in Rodriguez’s piece of an old anti-Semitic canard: the notion that the “wandering Jew”, cosmopolitan to a fault, undermines the stability of whatever society in which he finds himself, because his loyalties are eternally elsewhere. Though that is surely not Rodriguez’s intent, there’s no denying that jeremiads against “jet-setting elitists” who have no commitment to place are not new, and that in the past, many of those attacks have been aimed quite explicitly at Jews. Gregory ought to have known that.

But what I resent about the piece is the notion that loyalty to the world and all of its creatures is somehow incompatible with deep concern for the well-being of particular places. Rodriguez posits what is frankly a monstrously false dichotomy: parochial and engaged or cosmopolitan and unconcerned. Indeed, I assure Greg that there are those among his readers who are devoted to Los Angeles and its well-being without feeling any need to elevate the needs of L.A. above those of the entire planet!

I am a dual citizen, holding UK and US citizenship. My brother, his wife, and children hold a serious array of passports: Mexican, Austrian, British, and American. I have many friends who also have two nationalities, and I have a few acquaintances who have three. And no, we are not all part of some transnational global elite. I’ll be waiting a long time for my invite to rub elbows with the super-rich at the Davos Economic Forum. Of course, my dual citizenship is not without significance to me: it not only gives me and my family options about where to work and live, it reminds me that I do indeed have multiple loyalties and multiple commitments. But my devotion to any one place is not less because of a devotion to many. I have been fortunate to have been able to see much of the world, and am fortunate to have friends and family scattered across many continents. But that sense of belonging to the globe rather than to a country doesn’t mean I am any less passionately devoted to the well-being of Pasadena, or to my students, many of whom have never been on an airplane much less outside of the Western Hemisphere. Continue reading